2024 NBA draft rankings – Jonathan Givony’s top 100 prospects

The 2024 NBA draft is less than a week away, and it’s time to rank the players ahead of the two-day event, which begins Wednesday at 8 p.m. ET on ABC, ESPN and ESPN+.

Throughout the pre-draft process, the top 100 draft prospect rankings have been adjusted based on everything that happened at the draft combine, numbers and stats from pro day workouts, a number of first-hand scouting trips and intel heard from NBA coaches, scouts and front-office insiders.

This file is not a mock draft, as we’ve already revealed our most recent two-round prediction of where prospects will be drafted. We’ve also mocked a draft based on biggest need vs. best value, and have listed the players who rank best at 20 different skills. We’ve provided background information on some of the top international players, and even came up with 14 comparisons for prospects to NBA pros.

Here are scouting reports for the 100 prospects as draft experts Jonathan Givony and Jeremy Woo have taken into account recent news, medicals and intel from teams and players who are evaluating workouts, to inform ESPN’s Top 100 Big Board.

Notes: All heights are listed as the barefoot numbers from the NBA.

Rankings and write-ups were last updated on Friday, June 21.

NBA draft coverage:
Latest mock draft: Projecting all 58 picks
New mock draft simulator: Make your picks!
Draft order | More

6-foot-8 ½ | Age: 19.2 | Previously ranked: 1

Strengths: Risacher is a versatile wing whose ability to shoot on the move, competitiveness and versatility defensively and overall feel for the game helped him stand out against men playing high-level competition in the EuroCup and French league.

Weaknesses: He lacks ideal length and strength. While he shows ability as a passer and attacking in the open court, he is early in his development as a shot creator, playing a narrow role over the past season, leaving questions about his ability to soak up greater usage long-term.

The verdict: Risacher found other ways to contribute when he hit a midyear shooting slump and put together several strong playoff performances to finish the season. He has made a convincing case to hear his name called early in this draft, as every NBA team is looking for players in his mold.

---

2. Alex Sarr | PF/C | Perth (Australia)

6-11 ¾ | Age: 19.1 | Previously ranked: 2

Strengths: Sarr has a 9-foot-2 standing reach. He has impressive mobility, quickness and explosiveness that gives him rare upside as a rim-protector and switch defender stepping out on the perimeter.

Weaknesses: Sarr showed flashes of potential as a ball handler, passer and jump-shooter, but he is still finding consistency with his toughness and feel for the game to complement his impact as a rim-runner, pick-and-roll finisher and versatile defender.

The verdict: He exceeded expectations in his lone season in the NBL, anchoring Perth’s defense and finding ways to contribute in a smaller role as an 18-year-old. While Sarr still needs to get stronger and continue to evolve offensively, he fits a coveted mold as a power forward/center with the potential to be a difference-maker on both ends of the floor.

---

7-1 ¾ | Age: 20.3 | Previously ranked: 3

Strengths: Clingan was a driving force behind UConn’s championship run as a dominant presence protecting the rim with his 7-7 wingspan and impressive timing and instincts covering ground all over the floor.

Weaknesses: While he is a reliable finisher and offensive rebounder with feel as a passer, he is still evolving as a scorer. He struggles to make free throws at a high rate and lacks a degree of explosiveness operating in traffic.

The verdict: Clingan’s defensive impact was unmistakable last season after he worked through a foot injury that cost him five games. His size and activity level change the calculus for opposing finishers inside, and his feel for the game, skill level and youth leave room for optimism regarding how his offense can develop over time, especially with his ability to step out to the perimeter.

---

6-1 ¾ | Age: 19.9 | Previously ranked: 4

Strengths: Sheppard is a 3-point sniper with rare basketball instincts who had one of the most efficient offensive seasons in recent college basketball history as a freshman at Kentucky.

Weaknesses: He is a good athlete but has an even wingspan that limits him as both a finisher in traffic and one-on-one defender. Despite his sparkling efficiency, he posted one of the lowest usage rates of any of the projected draft picks, and at times, is unselfish to a fault.

The verdict: Sheppard is coming off a remarkable season, as he shot extremely well, both off the catch and off the dribble. He came up with a huge volume of steals and blocks in spite of his limited length and also posted efficient numbers in nearly every category in between. It will be fascinating to see just how effective Sheppard’s unique blend of skill, feel and instincts translates to the NBA level.

---

6-8 ¾ | Age: 19.6 | Previously ranked: 5

Strengths: Buzelis is a promising wing forward with positional size, explosive leaping ability, impressive rim-protecting instincts and developing versatility on both ends of the floor. Those traits translated inconsistently for G League Ignite, however.

Weaknesses: Buzelis’ average length and thin frame are limiting factors, as he has a 6-foot-10 wingspan and weighed under 200 pounds at the NBA combine in May. He’s also a streaky jumper who is still developing his ballhandling ability, which made it difficult for him to score efficiently at times last season.

The verdict: Buzelis has intriguing upside as his frame continues to get stronger — if he can regain the consistency he showed as a set shooter in previous settings. With a relatively high floor, the strides he makes as a shot creator will help determine his ceiling.

---

6-5 ½ | Age: 19.6 | Previously ranked: 6

Strengths: Castle has excellent size and length with budding versatility on both ends of the floor. His competitiveness and unselfishness made him a key cog in UConn’s NCAA championship run and give him a high floor at the next level.

Weaknesses: He shot just 27% from beyond the arc last season, and his mechanics leave much to be desired, especially when shooting off the dribble. Castle’s ability to space the floor will be a swing skill for him in the NBA.

The verdict: Castle often was tasked with guarding the opposing team’s best scorer, and the game seemed to slow down for him as the season wore on. He was able to pick and choose his spots on a talented roster. While he checks a lot of boxes, his ability to turn the corner as a shooter and overall scorer will play a big role in how he’s evaluated long term.

---

6-5 ¼ | Age: 23.1 | Previously ranked: 8

Strengths: Knecht is the top all-around scorer in this class, and he carried Tennessee last season with his shot-making prowess, pop as a finisher, ability to draw fouls putting the ball down aggressively and tremendous scoring instincts from the wing.

Weaknesses: He is not a great rebounder or defender, but he also carried a huge burden for the Volunteers. He has good physical tools to continue to improve on that end of the floor as his awareness off the ball evolves.

The verdict: Knecht scored more prolifically in the SEC than he did the season before in the Big Sky — he averaged 21.7 points per game last season — and has been one of this draft’s fastest risers. He put up games of 40 and 37 points, respectively, against Kentucky and Purdue, and he was spectacularly consistent on the offensive end, stepping up in big moments all season long.

---

6-1 | Age: 19.4 | Previously ranked: 7

Strengths: Dillingham is the most dynamic scoring guard in this draft. His combination of shiftiness, ballhandling, passing and shot-making prowess showed vividly off the bench at Kentucky. He averaged 15.2 points in 23.3 minutes per game.

Weaknesses: He lacks the ideal size and physicality to absorb contact in the lane and hold his own defensively, as he has only a 6-3 wingspan with a frame under 170 pounds.

The verdict: Long known for his ability to heat up in a hurry at the prep level, Dillingham backed that up with efficient perimeter shot-making and steady decision-making as a passer and scorer in his lone season in the SEC. Even if he faces an uphill battle defensively, his offensive gifts give him some of the biggest star power of any prospect in this class.

---

6-8 ¾ | Age: 18.8 | Previously ranked: 9

Strengths: Salaun is a physically gifted power forward whose length, frame, budding versatility as a shot-maker and defensive intensity stood out in his first professional opportunity in France.

Weaknesses: While he shows ability to make shots on the move, he lacks much in the way of ballhandling ability and was inconsistent with his processing speed on both ends of the floor, as one might expect from a late blooming 18-year old at this level of competition.

The verdict: Salaun’s best days are clearly in front of him, as he finished last season better than he started and carved out a significant role. His combination of size, shooting and competitiveness on the defensive end are intriguing, even if he’s still just getting his feet wet at the highest levels.

---

10. Nikola Topic | PG | Red Star (Adriatic League)

6-5 ¾ | Age: 18.8 | Previously ranked: 10

Strengths: The 18-year-old Topic is the top pick-and-roll shot creator in this draft. He’s an elite ball handler, passer and finisher who proved to be a creative force in the Adriatic League before losing his stint in the EuroLeague to knee injuries. He suffered a partially torn ACL in April, which might force him to redshirt his rookie season in the NBA.

Weaknesses: He has things to prove as a jump-shooter to open up the rest of his game at the NBA level, as he’s not a jet with the ball to compensate. His limited length is a concern defensively.

The verdict: Topic has come on strong over the past year and brings a promising blend of feel for the game, playmaking and confidence. He’ll face an adjustment period, especially in the wake of his injury, but his trajectory leaves a lot of room for optimism about his ability to find his way in the NBA.

---

6-6 ½ | Age: 19.5 | Previously ranked: 12

Strengths: Williams is a rangy perimeter player whose size, length and flashes of transition-scoring, playmaking and defensive versatility give him intriguing upside.

Weaknesses: Lacking a degree of strength, perimeter shooting and all-around consistency, Williams struggled to produce late in his freshman season, as he was hampered by injuries after a promising start.

The verdict: At his best, Williams looked like one of the most interesting players in this class, but he appeared unsure of himself late in the season. He is still early in his development, and there’s a disparity in opinions among scouts about how to view him long term.

---

6-2 ¼ | Age: 22.2 | Previously ranked: 13

Strengths: Carter is a defensive menace and tenacious lead guard whose significant improvement as a jump-shooter caused his draft stock to explode as a junior. He averaged 19.7 points and 8.7 rebounds per game.

Weaknesses: He has questions to answer about his ballhandling and shot-creation prowess, as well as his unorthodox shooting mechanics. He was able to score prolifically last season, in large part because of his explosiveness, physicality and aggressive approach.

The verdict: Carter carried Providence through a grueling Big East schedule, as his disruptive presence on defense, dogged toughness on the glass and newfound ability to score in bunches made him one of the best two-way players in the country. He could be an appealing fit next to a more dynamic facilitator.

---

6-6 ½ | Age: 18.9 | Previously ranked: 11

Strengths: Holland is a physical, aggressive and versatile wing who scored prolifically in a challenging season for G League Ignite.

Weaknesses: His poor decision-making and streakiness as a shooter were concerns that were amplified by his outsized role last season, but the 18-year-old has plenty of room to continue to improve. His season was cut short by a ruptured tendon in his right thumb, which forced him to miss the Ignite’s final 19 games.

The verdict: Holland earned a reputation for his competitiveness and unselfishness at the prep level, but he had an up-and-down season as a first option in a losing situation in the G League. His ability to find his range and bring those intangibles back to the forefront in a smaller role will be key to his success early in his NBA career.

---

6-4 ¼ | Age: 19.7 | Previously ranked: 14

Strengths: Walter is a long-armed wing with the competitiveness, dynamic shot-making prowess and off-court intangibles to play a coveted 3-and-D role.

Weaknesses: He is a good but not great athlete whose struggles to create off the dribble raise questions about how he’ll score on nights his jumper isn’t falling, as his efficiency tumbled in Big 12 play.

The verdict: Walter had a productive freshman season at Baylor with his ability to shoot off movement and aggressiveness crashing the offensive glass and drawing fouls. His 6-foot-10 wingspan and ability to shoot on the move give him a coveted role to grow into, but his ability to fill in the blanks in between will dictate his ceiling.

---

6-2 | Age: 20.3 | Previously ranked: 15

Strengths: McCain is a physical and competitive guard whose dynamic shooting, rebounding and intelligent style of play on both ends give him a high floor.

Weaknesses: He lacks great length and burst and has some things to prove as a playmaker after he played a lot of small-ball wing as a freshman last season.

The verdict: McCain was a bright spot for Duke all season making shots, drawing charges and doing a lot of little things with energy and instincts. He’ll need to continue to evolve as a ball handler and perimeter defender, but the growth he showed and his intangibles suggest he’ll find ways to contribute to winning at the next level.

---

7-3 ¾ | Age: 22.1 | Previously ranked: 16

Strengths: Edey is one of the biggest and most productive players the sport has seen. He has a 7-11 wingspan and 9-7 standing reach, but it’s his level of physicality, conditioning and confidence that gives him more upside than previous players in his mold.

Weaknesses: Though he improved dramatically in college, his speed will always be under the microscope defensively, and on offense he will need to be used consistently by a coach who is willing to take advantage of Edey’s unique mismatch potential.

The verdict: Edey was the most dominant player in college basketball over the past two seasons, winning back-to-back John R. Wooden Awards. He plays with the mean streak to take advantage of his rare physical tools. What kind of answers he can find defending in pick-and-roll will dictate just how smooth his transition will be to the NBA.

---

6-8 ¼ | Age: 23.1 | Previously ranked: 17

Strengths: Da Silva is a late-blooming forward with skill, smarts and coveted two-way versatility on the wing.

Weaknesses: He is a well-rounded player who lacks ideal physicality at 217 pounds and perhaps any one elite skill, but he does a lot of things well, making 40% of his 3-pointers and showing a strong feel for the game.

The verdict: Da Silva is a fluid player who can space the floor, attack closeouts and find the open man on the move while guarding multiple positions on defense. His ability to slide between roles is appealing even if his narrow frame figures to be a limiting factor in some matchups, especially considering he’s already 23 years old.

---

6-7 ½ | Age: 19.5 | Previously ranked: 18

Strengths: Furphy is a late-blooming swingman whose size and shooting in a complementary role changed the complexion of Kansas’s season and paved his way to the draft earlier than anyone expected.

Weaknesses: The 19-year-old lacks strength, length and consistency on defense, and he is not a dynamic shooter. That’s not all that surprising given his age and late rise to prominence in the summer before his freshman year.

The verdict: Furphy had some ups and downs throughout the season, but he thrived in a handful of key matchups when he was filling a small role. His size, shooting and willingness to play with intensity all work in his favor, even if he is still learning to shoot on the move and was not always strong enough to hold his own guarding in the Big 12.

---

6-3 ¾ | Age: 18.9 | Previously ranked: 20

Strengths: Carrington is a big guard with a budding floor game whose late growth spurt made him the most unexpected riser of the past year.

Weaknesses: While he has great size and has packed on some muscle, his frame is still a major work in progress. Similarly, he shot the 3 well late in the season but will have to prove his consistency.

The verdict: Carrington’s size, feel and midrange game won him a lot of fans last season, as he has a unique maturity for a young guard who was not expected to carry the additional pressure of being one-and-done this season. He might not be an overwhelming athlete, but he is on an interesting trajectory as a big guard who did some nice things operating out of the pick-and-roll.

---

6-7 | Age: 20.5 | Previously ranked: 19

Strengths: George is a big wing whose 3-point shooting ability, pace with the ball, vision and instincts give him intriguing long-term upside.

Weaknesses: George doesn’t have stellar athleticism, physicality or assertiveness to make the most of his talent consistently, and he remains green off the ball on defense.

The verdict: One of several unexpected one-and-done prospects in this draft, George flashed considerable talent between quiet stretches in his lone collegiate season. The Swiss swingman could fill a coveted role in the NBA if he can put everything together with the late-blooming trajectory he’s on.

---

6-10 ¾ | Age: 20.6 | Previously ranked: 21

Strengths: Filipowski is a skilled 7-footer who can shoot, dribble and pass, giving him unique offensive versatility projecting to the next level.

Weaknesses: While he was a force at times in the ACC, his consistency as a shooter, lack of physicality and limited length protecting the rim are concerns.

The verdict: Filipowski has no shortage of offensive talent and carried the Blue Devils when he put everything together over the past two seasons. Just how consistent he can be on that end could go a long way toward assuaging concerns about his presence on defense.

---

6-10 ¾ | Age: 20.1 | Previously ranked: 23

Strengths: Missi is a rim-running big man with impressive mobility and explosiveness as a lob threat and physical tools that could serve him down the line on the defensive end.

Weaknesses: He lacks polish, experience and the physicality to maximize his ability as a rim-protector and rebounder. He has room to improve his scoring versatility and awareness as a passer.

The verdict: Missi might not be the most polished player — he didn’t start playing organized basketball until he was 16 — but he has the rare physical tools to give him an obvious role at the NBA level. If his processing speed and frame continue to improve, the Cameroon native has potential as a screen-setter and rim-protector who can do a little more than that offensively.

---

6-2 ½ | Age: 19.6 | Previously ranked: 22

Strengths: Collier is a big, strong guard whose burst, scoring instincts and ability to create in the open court and bully defenders in a straight line stood out as he closed his freshman season on a high note.

Weaknesses: He has a lot of tools with which to work, but he struggled with turnovers, has concerning shooting mechanics and made some avoidable mistakes with lapses on both ends of the floor.

The verdict: Collier’s shot-creation gifts and physicality at the rim set the bar high coming into the season, and while he finished better than he started, he had some ups and downs at USC. His upside is apparent, but he has questions to answer on both ends at the NBA level.

---

6-11 ¾ | Age: 20.1 | Previously ranked: 24

Strengths: Ware has mobility as a rim-protector and a budding skill level in a 7-foot frame, giving him unicorn potential at his position. His game matured noticeably as a sophomore at Indiana after he spent a season at Oregon.

Weaknesses: He lacks ideal feel for the game and all-around consistency, even if he has made noticeable strides with his motor.

The verdict: Ware is a bouncy finisher who runs like a guard, shoots the 3 with promising mechanics and even has some coordination and skill with the ball. Talent was never a concern, but he still has questions to answer regarding his tenacity and awareness on both ends of the floor, something he did a good job of addressing last season.

---

6-1 ¼ | Age: 23.7 | Previously ranked: 26

Strengths: Kolek is a tough-minded guard whose skill level as a scorer and vision as a passer made him the engine of one of the top offenses in college basketball over the past two seasons.

Weaknesses: He is not the biggest nor most physically gifted floor general, lacking great length and explosiveness. That makes it difficult for him to score in traffic at times or hold his own against some matchups defensively.

The verdict: Kolek picked opposing defenses apart last season out of pick-and-rolls, whipping the ball around to shooters, getting to floaters and proving opportunistic in shooting; he hit 39% of his shots from beyond the arc. His average tools might make him divisive among NBA teams, but his approach and feel for the game will appeal to franchises looking for a backup point guard.

---

6-5 ¾ | Age: 23.8 | Previously ranked: 33

Strengths: Shannon is an explosive wing who has long thrived defensively and in the open floor but made strides with his floor game as a fifth-year senior at Illinois.

Weaknesses: While he had an exceptionally efficient season, it was largely built on his free-throw shooting and shot-making prowess, as he still has something to prove as a spot-up shooter.

The verdict: Shannon emerged as one of the best players in college basketball last season, scoring in bunches, being assertive and pulling up off the dribble. He turned in several huge games late in the season when his jumper was falling, and he has significant potential on both ends.

---

6-6 ¼ | Age: 23.7 | Previously ranked: 25

Strengths: Scheierman is a dynamic perimeter scorer who shoots the ball at a high level on the move while contributing with his versatility and feel for the game on the wing.

Weaknesses: He is not particularly long or physically gifted, complicating his defensive potential at the NBA level, especially considering he will turn 24 in September.

The verdict: Scheierman, who played some point guard at the mid-major level while recording numerous double-doubles last season, brings interesting things to the table as a rebounder and passer for a player who might be the best movement shooter in this draft.

---

6-6 ¼ | Age: 21.4 | Previously ranked: 34

Strengths: Dunn is the draft’s best defender. He’s adept at using his length, explosiveness, mobility and instincts to guard multiple positions and be disruptive on and off the ball.

Weaknesses: He is an interesting litmus test; he has a great deal to prove offensively. He lacks much in the way of ballhandling and shooting ability, making just 12 3-pointers in 65 games and hitting 53% of his career free throw attempts.

The verdict: Dunn had a monster season on the defensive end, shutting down opposing guards, wings and forwards, blocking a massive volume of shots and consistently going out of his area for rebounds. Thanks to his game-changing defensive ability, he should be able to carve out an NBA role if he can become even a mediocre perimeter threat.

---

6-8 ¾ | Age: 21.2 | Previously ranked: 27

Strengths: Klintman is a big, versatile forward whose ability to space the floor, finish in transition and make plays on defense helped him carve out a big role in the NBL.

Weaknesses: He has things to prove with his feel for the game and consistency on both ends of the floor.

The verdict: Klintman played a rotation role in his lone collegiate season, but he flashed his talent more consistently in Australia. At his best, he fits a coveted mold with his size, shooting and mobility on the defensive end.

---

30. Pacome Dadiet | SG/SF | Ratiopharm Ulm

6-7 ¾ | Age: 18.9 | Previously ranked: 29

Strengths: Dadiet is a big, strong and extremely young wing who finished his season in Germany on a positive note, scoring efficiently and prolifically on a per-minute basis as an 18-year-old against high-level competition.

Weaknesses: Just an average athlete, ball handler, passer and defender, he will need to become a more consistent 3-point shooter to carve out a consistent role in the NBA.

The verdict: Dadiet has good scoring instincts finishing around the rim and hitting 3-pointers, both with his feet set and pulling up off the dribble. He has plenty of room to continue to improve as one of the youngest prospects in this class.

---

6-5 ½ | Age: 21.5 | Previously ranked: 28

Strengths: Tyson is a big, versatile guard who nearly doubled his scoring average at Cal to lead the Pac-12 in points per game (19.6, from 10.7).

Weaknesses: He lacks high-end length and explosiveness, and he will likely need to scale down his shot selection and decision-making in a more compact off-ball role at the next level.

The verdict: Tyson was one of the most improved players in college basketball last season. He put the ball in the basket in a variety of ways, putting pressure on the rim and showing growth as a pull-up 3-point shooter. His consistency off the ball on both ends will be a point of interest moving forward.

---

6-4 ½ | Age: 18.9 | Previously ranked: 32

Strengths: Christie is a smooth sharpshooter with positional size and an intriguing frame. His feathery touch and diverse shot-making prowess from the perimeter helped him exceed expectations in a major way as an 18-year-old freshman at Minnesota.

Weaknesses: He did most of his damage away from the rim, lacking a degree of physicality as a slasher and defender.

The verdict: Christie’s fluidity and scoring instincts stood out not just when spacing the floor but also running off screens and pulling up off the dribble. Couple that with his age and physical tools, and it is not hard to see why NBA teams would bet on his continued development, even if he’s likely not ready to help a team as a rookie.

---

6-8 ¼ | Age: 21.2 | Previously ranked: 37

Strengths: Bona has some of the best physical tools in this draft with outstanding mobility, explosiveness and a 7-4 wingspan. His nonstop intensity, physicality and ability to cover ground seamlessly give him a clear role at the NBA level — if he can improve his discipline on both ends.

Weaknesses: As well as Bona finishes lobs and covers ground defensively, he was plagued by fouls and turnovers last season and isn’t the defensive rebounder you might hope due to his average feel for the game.

The verdict: The Nigerian-born big man had an up-and-down season on a disappointing UCLA team. But he has several key ingredients that should allow him to thrive in a protracted role as a finisher and switch defender as he adds more polish.

---

6-9 | Age: 19.6 | Previously ranked: 30

Strengths: Smith was a bright spot for G League Ignite last season, as his inside-outside scoring ability made him extremely productive on a per-minute basis. He averaged 13.7 points and 5.1 rebounds in 22 minutes per game

Weaknesses: He had a more difficult transition defensively and has room to improve his feel for the game.

The verdict: Smith thrived in a simplified role, shooting the 3 consistently with a high-release point and putting several defenders on posters attacking in a straight line or finishing lobs. While the 19-year old remains raw in some areas, his combination of youth, size and scoring ability is intriguing.

---

35. AJ Johnson | SG | Illawarra

6-4 ¼ | Age: 19.5 | Previously ranked: 35

Strengths: Johnson is a fluid, talented guard with a narrow frame who is looking to build on the experience he picked up in the NBL.

Weaknesses: He played sparingly last season as his lack of strength, defensive prowess and consistency remain a work in progress.

The verdict: Johnson flashed his talent at the NBA combine much like he did in short spurts this season in the NBL, showing his ability to operate at different speeds, make shots off the bounce and find teammates on the move. He has obvious things to build off as his frame and game continue to mature, especially on a patient team willing to give him the developmental reps he lacked in Australia.

---

36. Juan Nunez | PG | Ratiopharm Ulm

6-4 | Age: 20.0 | Previously ranked: 36

Strengths: Nunez brings rare creativity, vision and flair to the point guard position, as his shooting, defense and decision-making continue to evolve.

Weaknesses: He made strides with his pull-up jumper last season, but he is limited in spots by his difficulties keeping defenders honest away from the rim and lack of great burst.

The verdict: Nunez built on the minutes he received at last year’s FIBA World Cup for Spain, showing growth in several areas in the EuroCup and BBL. While he still has some things to prove, he’s one of the draft’s best playmakers and has excellent size, strength and feel for the game that could prove valuable in a backup role.

---

6-5 ¼ | Age: 23.2 | Previously ranked: 38

Strengths: McCullar earned a reputation as a high-level utility wing over his five seasons in college, and he answered a lot of questions with his improvement offensively in his final year at Kansas before being hampered by a knee injury.

Weaknesses: While he made clear strides as a spot-up shooter, his consistency — especially off the dribble — still leaves something to be desired and is one of the biggest question marks. He made 31% of his 3s over his career.

The verdict: McCullar’s toughness, competitiveness and versatility always showed up in his ability to guard and pass, and his improved scoring prowess and efficiency as a senior made him Kansas’ most valuable player. While a knee injury ended his season early, his two-way productivity gives him a clear route to minutes on the wing if he can take another step as a shooter.

---

6-8 ¾ | Age: 21.8 | Previously ranked: 39

Strengths: Holmes is a skilled interior scorer who made the most of his return to school, improving his body and developing his perimeter skills.

Weaknesses: While he has become more versatile on offense, his lack of great quickness on the perimeter on defense and average size and length leave him stuck between positions.

The verdict: Holmes excelled as a pick-and-roll finisher and post scorer as an underclassman at Dayton, but he found 3-point range and made clear strides as a ball handler and passer as a junior. He has questions to answer defensively, but he brings a diverse offensive skill set that made him one of the top per-minute scorers in college basketball.

---

6-6 | Age: 20.5 | Previously ranked: 31

Strengths: Edwards was a highly touted prep prospect who found his footing once expectations recalibrated in his freshman season. He shot the 3 well (36.5%) and saw the game slow down for him on both ends of the floor.

Weaknesses: He struggled for large parts of the season, as he’s a good (but not great) athlete with a 6-foot-10 wingspan and average floor game, which put a lot of pressure on his jump shooting and inconsistent defense.

The verdict: Edwards might not have had the most consistent season, but in his best moments, he made an impact on offense and defense with the type of size, length and pedigree that is hard to come by. Even if it is as a role player, there’s room for optimism about what kind of player he could grow into if he puts everything together.

---

6-6 ¼ | Age: 22.6 | Previously ranked: 41

Strengths: Mogbo is a late-blooming, undersized big man with a lean frame, long arms and explosive physical tools.

Weaknesses: He does not have any floor-spacing ability to speak of at this stage, which puts a lot of pressure on his ability to finish inside against bigger and stronger defenders in the NBA. Plus, his limited experience shows in his inconsistent technique on defense.

The verdict: Mogbo is a junior college product who grew late and garnered little interest out of high school. He has blossomed into a bouncy lob threat, effective slasher and out-of-area rebounder who is one of the best playmaking big men in this draft. He excels at pushing off the glass and finding teammates on the move.

---

6-3 ¼ | Age: 21.9 | Previously ranked: 44

Strengths: Mitchell is a big, creative guard who excels operating in the pick and roll, showing ability as a passer and midrange scorer.

Weaknesses: He plays with pace more than explosiveness and has questions to answer regarding the lack of volume as an outside shooter throughout his career. He hit just 63 3-pointers in 85 games (33%).

The verdict: Mitchell was the best player in the Big West despite playing through injuries. The Belgian guard backed up his standing with a strong showing running his team at the NBA combine and has several key ingredients teams are looking for from a backup with his size, feel for the game, willingness to defend, unselfishness and budding shot-making prowess.

---

6-3 | Age: 24.2 | Previously ranked: 52

Strengths: Spencer is a first-team All-Big East player whose shot-making diversity, passing acumen and feel for the game made him a key cog in UConn’s national championship run.

Weaknesses: Already 24 years old, Spencer is not particularly tall, long or explosive, getting by on toughness and instincts at the college level defensively. That might not translate as seamlessly to the NBA, as he has limited physical tools.

The verdict: Spencer is an excellent off-screen shooter whose consistency pulling up off the dribble puts added pressure on defenses as he constantly moves without the ball. His competitiveness, skill level and experience were huge assets for the Huskies last season and often overshadow his physical limitations, which are nonetheless questions he’ll have to answer in the NBA on both ends of the floor.

---

43. Ulrich Chomche | PF/C | NBA Academy Africa

6-10 ¼ | Age: 18.4 | Previously ranked: 42

Strengths: Chomche is a young, inexperienced big man with massive defensive potential, thanks to his 7-4 wingspan, exceptional frame and mobility.

Weaknesses: Most of his experience has come at the junior level, as he spent last season at the NBA Academy Africa.

The verdict: While Chomche remains green offensively, he has a lot of things that can’t be taught. He has flashed ability as a passer and shooter, which could be developed into more consistent traits down the road. The Cameroon native is far from being ready to help an NBA team, but he is interesting for a team that believes in its player development system.

---

6-5 ¼ | Age: 21.5 | Previously ranked: 43

Strengths: Ingram is a long and strong swingman whose versatility, feel for the game and improvement as a spot-up shooter made him an indispensable player for the Tar Heels.

Weaknesses: While Ingram checks a lot of boxes with his 7-foot wingspan and 3-point shooting (39% last season), he is a good but not great athlete who struggled to finish inside the arc (45% on 2-point shots) throughout his college career. He is only a 62% free throw shooter, raising questions about just how consistent of a perimeter threat he can become in the long term.

The verdict: Ingram is a terrific rebounder, heady passer and capable shot-maker who stuffed the stat sheet and came up big in several high-profile games last season. He has the tools to hold his own defensively and has appeal as a role player, especially if he can take the next step with his shooting.

---

6-5 ¼ | Age: 23.3 | Previously ranked: 45

Strengths: Larsson is a strong-framed wing with two-way versatility who contributed steadily on and off the ball as a senior in the Pac-12.

Weaknesses: He is not especially rangy on the defensive end or dynamic with the ball, despite making contributions as a playmaker on both ends of the floor. He has questions to answer in those areas projecting to the NBA level, as well as with his reluctance to take open jumpers at times, despite hitting an excellent 43% of his attempts.

The verdict: Larsson played a key role for an Arizona team that earned a No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament. He scored efficiently, made smart and unselfish decisions as a secondary ball handler and used his physicality and smarts on the defensive end. He has excellent role-player potential, provided he can prove his outside shooting will translate to the NBA level.

---

6-0 ¼ | Age: 21.9 | Previously ranked: 51

Strengths: Shead is one of the winningest players in this draft class — he went 120-18 in his college career. His defensive intensity, unselfish passing and competitiveness give him upside as a backup point guard.

Weaknesses: He lacks in size and consistency as a shooter. Shead, however, set the tone for Houston last season, helping them earn the No. 1 seed in the NCAA tournament.

The verdict: Shead brings similar intangibles that allowed T.J. McConnell and Jose Alvarado to stick in the league despite lacking elite physical tools or scoring. His ability to manage a game while putting opposing guards through the wringer gives him a clear niche he can fill in the NBA, and he’ll have a chance at a role if he can improve his shooting.

---

6-6 ½ | Age: 20.8 | Previously ranked: 46

Strengths: Wells is a late-blooming, former Division II star whose size and shooting (42% on 3-pointers) translated in impressive fashion in his lone season at Washington State.

Weaknesses: As efficient as he was last season, Wells is still coming into his own on both ends of the floor, lacking a degree of toughness, length, versatility and feel that he’ll need in order to carve out a role in the NBA.

The verdict: Wells played sparingly early last season but shot the ball so well his role continued to expand as he finished the year among the best spot-up shooters in the country. His pull-up shooting in pick-and-roll reps only add to his appeal as someone who grew considerably in high school and still has upside to tap into. He’ll have a chance to outplay his draft position if he can evolve on both ends of the floor, as he’s only 20 years old.

---

48. Melvin Ajinca | SG/SF | Saint-Quentin

6-7 ¼ | Age: 19.9 | Previously ranked: 47

Strengths: Ajinca is a promising role player coming off a solid season in Pro A France. He had several impactful stretches, finding his range impressively and bringing great energy on the defensive end of the floor.

Weaknesses: While Ajinca has run red-hot at times, his consistency as a shooter is critical (career 32% mark from 3-point range). He has an even wingspan and lacks great ballhandling and the playmaking ability to consistently create his own shot. He will also have some lapses at times on the defensive end.

The verdict: Ajinca improved his standing considerably at the FIBA U19 World Cup last summer, flashing dynamic shot-making prowess and bringing aggressiveness on both ends of the floor. He did that in spurts in Saint-Quentin last season and has intrigue when he puts everything together offensively. He’s young, with his 20th birthday on June 26.

---

6-6 ¼ | Age: 22.9 | Previously ranked: 50

Strengths: Johnson is a strong, explosive, energetic and highly competitive big man whose perimeter shooting and passing improvement as a fifth-year senior have simplified his fit at the NBA level.

Weaknesses: Johnson is undersized for a power forward without great length to compensate and is not adept at creating his own shot. The small sample of 3-point makes and his career 64% free throw shooting raise questions about how consistent of a shooter he can become in the long term.

The verdict: Johnson was among the best defenders in college basketball, tasked with guarding up and down the floor for Arizona. His versatility and toughness give him a niche he can build off in the NBA, provided he can provide ample floor spacing.

---

6-7 | Age: 20.3 | Previously ranked: 40

Strengths: Djurisic is a physically gifted wing who scored in bunches late in the 2023-24 season to give himself momentum in the draft process.

Weaknesses: With an even wingspan and just an average feel for the game, he will face questions about his defensive potential and will need to show more consistency with his decision-making and 3-point shooting to carve out a niche at the next level.

The verdict: After finding mixed results early in the year, Nikola Topic’s departure opened the door for Djurisic to take on a playmaking role for Mega Basket, where he excelled and played the best basketball of his career in a winning context. His size, athletic ability and scoring talent are undeniable, and he has upside to grow into at just 20 years old.

---

6-4 ½ | Age: 22.6 | Previously ranked: 48

Strengths: Jones is a jumbo playmaker with impressive versatility who flirted with triple-doubles all season at the low-major level.

Weaknesses: As productive as he was, he still has questions to answer about his explosiveness, shooting and defensive intensity.

The verdict: Playing on the ball at 6-6, 235 pounds with a 6-11 wingspan, Jones is a physical slasher with great instincts on both ends of the floor. While his assertiveness made him a force in Big Sky play, he’ll surely need to improve his career 32% 3-point shooting mark while transitioning to a more compact role in the NBA.

---

6-0 ¼ | Age: 21.8 | Previously ranked: 53

Strengths: Simpson is an undersized, creative scoring guard who took a huge step forward in his junior season, propelling Colorado to two NCAA tournament wins. Simpson’s efficiency rose despite carrying a significant load, making shots in bunches from all over the floor with his outstanding scoring instincts.

Weaknesses: While a good athlete, he lacks great size and has average length and strength. He frequently gives up size defensively on most nights, which might be a bigger issue at the next level.

The verdict: Simpson, one of the most improved players in college basketball last season, is a terrific ball handler with good speed, reliable mechanics as a pull-up shooter and deft touch on his floater. His intensity on defense gives him a fighting chance when paired with his offensive gifts and could help compensate for his small stature.

---

6-6 ¾ | Age: 23.1 | Previously ranked: 55

Strengths: Bridges is a physically gifted forward who shot 42% from 3-point range as a senior and possesses a well-built frame and 6-10 wingspan, giving him strong potential as a multi-positional 3-and-D wing.

Weaknesses: While he has ingredients to work with defensively, he is still learning how to avoid miscues on both ends of the floor and is not a great ball handler or passer.

The verdict: Bridges made a huge leap as a spot-up threat last season and will likely hang around the NBA for a long time if he can continue to make shots at a strong rate. He might not add much on the ball and has some things to prove defensively, but he has an obvious role to fill at a position of significant need among NBA teams.

---

6-4 ½ | Age: 23.5 | Previously ranked: 60

Strengths: Reeves is a dynamic shooter who made 45% of his 3-pointers last season, ranking among the most productive and efficient scorers in the country as a fifth-year senior at Kentucky.

Weaknesses: At age 23, he lacks physicality on the defensive end and is not much of a playmaker or passer.

The verdict: Reeves might not be the most versatile two-way player, but he was as diverse a shot-maker as there was in college basketball last season. There’s an obvious niche for him to fill as a bench scorer, and he could have some upward mobility if he can find a way to hold his own defensively, especially off the ball.

---

6-1 ½ | Age: 19.7 | Previously ranked: 54

Strengths: James is an explosive guard with strong defensive versatility whose upward trajectory out of high school was interrupted by a medical emergency that derailed his freshman season. He underwent a procedure last summer to repair a congenital heart defect and was cleared to be drafted by the NBA’s Fitness to Play Panel.

Weaknesses: James did not have an overly productive season at USC, averaging just 4.8 points per game. Standing just under 6-foot-3 in shoes, he is not a dynamic ball handler or shot-creator, lacking assertiveness at times.

The verdict: James made strides as a senior in high school and had impressive showings in the spring all-star circuit, but he had a difficult time finding his footing at USC, especially as a scorer. His strong feel for the game, length, frame, budding shot-making prowess and competitiveness defensively give him plenty of things to work with in the long term if he can get back on the encouraging track he was on before his cardiac arrest.

---

56. Trentyn Flowers | SG/SF | Adelaide

6-6 ½ | Age: 19.2 | Previously ranked: 56

Strengths: Flowers is an explosive athlete with good size on the wing who struggled to make an impact in the NBL straight out of school.

Weaknesses: His thin frame, lack of polish defensively and raw decision-making made it difficult to earn consistent minutes, but he showed impressive scoring talent in spurts that could be harnessed into more consistent ability in time.

The verdict: Flowers’ combination of leaping ability and shot-making prowess certainly pops, giving him real upside to grow into in the G League in the long term. He lacks experience on both ends of the floor, but he has the tools, potential as a set shooter and youth to leave room for optimism for a team willing to be patient with his development.

---

6-7 ¼ | Age: 23.8 | Previously ranked: 59

Strengths: Freeman is a lanky former walk-on turned walking double-double who competes with infectious energy and flashed some potential as a jump-shooter to cap his career at Akron.

Weaknesses: Playing mostly as a small-ball center in college, Freeman will need to make strides with his shooting as he likely transitions to guarding smaller players with his 212-pound frame.

The verdict: Freeman has a terrific backstory and grew into one of the best big men in the mid-major ranks over his five-year collegiate career. While his activity level and 7-2 wingspan are significant assets, showing he has the ability to take the next step, diversify his offensive repertoire, and defend different positions along the perimeter would solidify his standing as a pro.

---

6-9 ½ | Age: 21.9 | Previously ranked: 57

Strengths: Ighodaro is an unconventional big man whose passing and defensive versatility made him impactful on both ends of the floor for a very good Marquette team the past few seasons.

Weaknesses: His lack of perimeter shooting ability, poor length and limited physicality on the glass make him a situational roster fit for most teams that need the right players around him to thrive.

The verdict: Ighodaro’s ability to handle pushing off the defensive glass, operating out of dribble handoffs, and passing and defending all over the floor could be assets in the right system. Continuing to get stronger and expanding his shooting range could simplify his fit, but his versatility and activity level give him an interesting foundation off which to build.

---

6-7 ¾ | Age: 23.9 | Previously ranked: 58

Strengths: Jones is a long-armed big man with a strong frame and intriguing two-way versatility who took the Pac-12 by storm with his aggressiveness and feel for the game.

Weaknesses: He did not show much shooting potential last season, making just one 3-pointer, and was not overly impactful on the glass. His lack of high-level experience showed at times.

The verdict: Jones, a juco walk-on who had zero Division I interest out of high school and grew late, impressed at the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament and G League Elite Camp to earn a trip to the NBA combine. He stood out everywhere he played in the pre-draft process with his physicality, intensity and instincts on both ends of the floor. He has the makings of a useful backup with his 7-3 wingspan and the budding versatility he shows, and he could carve out an NBA role if he can find a way to stretch out his range — something he flashed this spring.

---

7-0 | Age: 24.2 | Previously ranked: 61

Strengths: Post is a big man with a terrific shooting stroke and an exceptionally high skill level.

Weaknesses: He lacks mobility, physicality and explosiveness, which limits him on both ends of the floor.

The verdict: The Dutch stretch-5 center might not win any footraces, but he can shoot, pass and handle the ball at a very high level, with the instincts on both ends of the floor to match. Going for 30 and 10 three times last season, Post’s production was a bright spot for Boston College and leaves room for optimism about his future prospects operating alongside more talented teammates.

---

6-8 ¼ | Age: 22.3 | Previously ranked: 62

Strengths: Hall is a productive big man whose improved shooting opened up his game as an upperclassman.

Weaknesses: While he is very physical, he is not a prolific rebounder or rim-protector, lacking high-level awareness on both ends of the floor and being stuck between the power forward and center positions defensively.

The verdict: Hall catalyzed Clemson’s run to the Elite Eight, capping off a productive career. His power game and competitiveness give him a chance to carve out an NBA career, but his consistency from beyond the arc will be his swing skill, as he made 33% of his career 3-pointers in college.

---

6-3 ¼ | Age: 21.1 | Previously ranked: 63

Strengths: Alexander is a fluid guard who took on a significant challenge playing on the ball as Creighton’s first option, helping his team make the Elite Eight.

Weaknesses: While he had a productive season, he struggled to create high-percentage shots for himself and others, lacking explosiveness and physicality with the ball, which also hampered him at times on defense.

The verdict: Alexander’s size, length and versatility at the guard positions are intriguing, even if he’s somewhat of a jack-of-all-trades but master of none. His ability to become a more efficient scorer while shoring up his defense will determine if he’s able to carve out an NBA role.

---

63. Ariel Hukporti | C | Ludwigsburg

6-10 ¾ | Age: 22.1 | Previously ranked: 64

Strengths: Hukporti is a chiseled, mobile center who emerged as the most productive rebounder in this class on both ends of the floor on a per-minute basis.

Weaknesses: He is not particularly skilled away from the rim or comfortable guarding in space, living off his energy more than a great feel for the game. Injuries have been a concern and have limited his ability to participate in much of the pre-draft process.

The verdict: Hukporti had a highly productive season in the NBL, showing his ability to rim-run, finish lobs, corral rebounds and block shots at a strong rate. His reach and energetic style of play make him a fit at the end of an NBA bench.

---

64. Mantas Rubstavicius | SF | NZ Breakers

6-6 ¼ | Age: 22.1 | Previously ranked: 66

Strengths: Rubstavicius is a big wing who had efficient scoring ability in a complementary role in the NBL, making shots at a better rate than he ever has in his career.

Weaknesses: He’s smart and highly competitive, but his lack of length and quickness are limiting factors projecting to the highest levels in the long term.

The verdict: Rubstavicius is a skilled offensive player with an excellent feel for the game who made encouraging strides last season after being slowed by injuries. He turned the corner developmentally a season ago after a late growth spurt. He has been on a promising trajectory and, at the very least, could develop into a longtime EuroLeague and Lithuanian national team player.

---

65. Armel Traore | PF | Blois

6-8 ¾ | Age: 21.4 | Previously ranked: 67

Strengths: Traore is a physically gifted power forward with an impressive combination of length (7-3 wingspan) and strength who turned a corner with his skill set and had a highly productive season in Pro A France.

Weaknesses: While he has improved in several areas, his jump shot (career 30% mark from 3-point range) remains a limiting factor, and he can be mistake-prone on both ends of the floor.

The verdict: Traore broke out last season, thriving in transition, rebounding the ball at a high level and even flashing some ability as a passer. His combination of tools and trajectory give him upside to grow into, but his ability to take the next step as a shooter could take his game to a different level.

---

6-3 ¼ | Age: 23.1 | Previously ranked: 68

Strengths: Newton is a good-sized guard coming off back-to-back national championships, making strides as a fifth-year senior with his playmaking and interior finishing.

Weaknesses: His outlook is limited by his average physical tools, inconsistent shooting and defensive impact. There are questions about how much room the 23-year-old has to grow in those areas.

The verdict: Newton’s improved floor game and decision-making played a big role in UConn’s second straight title. He stepped up as a shot-maker in big games last season, and his leadership and experience contributed to UConn’s well-oiled machine. His size and experience will earn him pro opportunities, and he has a chance to stick if he can find consistent range.

---

6-5 ¼ | Age: 22.6 | Previously ranked: 70

Strengths: Crawford stands out with his 7-foot wingspan, huge hands, defensive playmaking stats and career 40% 3-point percentage, all of which give him intriguing role-player potential as a 3-and-D combo forward.

Weaknesses: He is not a polished ball handler or decision-maker, looking somewhat mechanical and being more mistake-prone than teams might hope on both ends of the floor.

The verdict: NBA teams covet rangy players with the length to guard multiple positions and the ability to knock down spot up jumpers. While Crawford faces a transition from Conference USA — he is not an overly prolific shooter or the most explosive athlete — he has upside he could tap into in the right role.

---

6-10 | Age: 22.6 | Previously ranked: 75

Strengths: Dante is a physically imposing center with a 7-6 wingspan and 260-pound frame who willed Oregon to the NCAA tournament with his productivity around the rim. He has posted excellent defensive playmaking figures throughout his career.

Weaknesses: He is a traditional center who lacks shooting range and is not particularly comfortable sliding his feet on the perimeter defensively. He was hobbled by injuries that have derailed his mobility.

The verdict: While Dante does not bring much versatility, he nonetheless fits the mold some teams are looking for at the end of their bench as a big, physical interior presence on both ends of the floor. He had the most impactful stretch of his career late last season, as his motor ran especially hot during the Ducks’ improbable Pac-12 and NCAA tournament run.

---

6-11 ½ | Age: 24.2 | Previously ranked: 71

Strengths: Edwards, who has a 7-5 wingspan, is one of the biggest players in this draft. With more fluidity than most players his size, he’s a capable lob threat, offensive rebounder and rim-protector.

Weaknesses: He has some touch in the post but lacks skill with the ball and consistency at the foul line, possessing a fairly rudimentary skill set and feel for the game while weighing just 236 pounds at 24 years old.

The verdict: Edwards has things that can’t be taught and made strides with his toughness to make the most of his tools more consistently at West Virginia. He is not the springiest or most skilled center, but he has the right ingredients to play a backup role and could be useful on a two-way contract in the right situation.

---

6-1 ¼ | Age: 22.7 | Previously ranked: 73

Strengths: Beekman is a standout defender and steady game manager whose intensity and decision-making give him a unique profile as a role player.

Weaknesses: Just an average athlete, his scoring ability did not evolve as much as hoped. He lacks the ideal shooting ability (32% career from 3-point range) to compensate for his difficulties creating consistent separation.

The verdict: Beekman was one of the best defensive guards in college basketball over the past few seasons, and that should grant him an opportunity to try to redefine himself offensively at the next level in a faster-paced situation with more talent around him.

---

6-7 | Age: 23.7 | Previously ranked: 74

Strengths: Minix is a four-year NAIA standout whose toughness, skill level and versatility translated seamlessly to the D-I level, as he lifted Morehead State to the NCAA tournament last season.

Weaknesses: He lacks great size or length and will have things to prove defensively making the transition to the NBA as a result. He’s undersized for a big man with his 6-9 wingspan and not possessing great quickness on the perimeter.

The verdict: Minix was the best player in the Ohio Valley Conference last season and will have a chance to carve out an NBA niche if his career 40% 3-point shooting translates to the next level. His ability to put the ball in the basket in a variety of ways, two-way instincts and competitiveness could help him finish his unprecedented rise from the NAIA to the NBA despite his average physical tools.

---

6-7 | Age: 23.0 | Previously ranked: 97

Strengths: Jones is a versatile two-way forward with length, shot-making ability and defensive instincts who battled injuries as a fifth-year senior but was an impact player when healthy.

Weaknesses: Jones had wrist surgery after the season, which derailed his pre-draft process. Injuries have been a persistent issue throughout his career. He is not the most physical or explosive forward, lacking consistency at times considering he’s already 23 years old.

The verdict: At his best, Jones was one of the best 3-point shooters in the country. He contributed as a point-of-attack defender with his length and played with the competitiveness that NBA teams look for from a 6-7 role player. Due to the scarcity of players at his position and mold, he is a strong candidate for a two-way contract.

---

6-5 ¾ | Age: 24.4 | Previously ranked: 100

Strengths: Hinson was the most prolific shooting forward in the power conference ranks this past season, hitting 110 3-pointers in 33 games on a 42% clip as a sixth-year senior.

Weaknesses: From an NBA perspective, he is somewhat stuck between positions, lacking size for a power forward at 6-7 and mobility and explosiveness on the wing. At 24 years old, his poor physical profile is what it is, as he brings very little as a rebounder or defensive playmaker while struggling to score efficiently inside the arc.

The verdict: Hinson might not look the part, but his scoring instincts and shooting versatility stood out at Pittsburgh last season as he ranked among the most efficient first options in college basketball, giving him a coveted niche he can hang his hat on in the NBA.

---

6-9 | Age: 23.6 | Previously ranked: 82

Strengths: Disu is a productive and versatile big man whose sudden rise as a jump-shooter last season changed his pro outlook and the Longhorns’ season.

Weaknesses: His lack of speed covering ground defensively, poor rebounding ability and struggles playing above the rim in space raise questions about his ability to stay on the floor at the NBA level if his 45% mark from 3-point range in 2023-24 reverts to his poor career mark (34% over five seasons).

The verdict: Disu has enough playmaking ability and defensive instincts in addition to his stretch potential that it’s difficult to understand why he was given such a cold shoulder from the NBA in the pre-draft process. He’s going to get plenty of looks in summer league and the G League and could very well find himself on a two-way contract next season.

---

6-7 ½ | Age: 23.7 | Previously ranked: 87

Strengths: Watson is a smart, versatile forward whose feel for the game and competitiveness made him a valuable cog in a variety of roles over five seasons at Gonzaga.

Weaknesses: He is a below-average athlete by NBA standards and is not as prolific from the perimeter as one would hope to compensate, making just 44 3-pointers in 149 career games.

The verdict: Watson’s ability to defend guards, wings and big men stands out along with his passing ability, intensity and willingness to do the little things, a big reason he won 130 of 149 games in his decorated college career. He will not stand out on tools or scoring ability, but he is a team-first player who will have a chance to carve out an NBA career if he can prove his 41% 3-point accuracy on limited attempts from beyond the arc last season was not a fluke.

---

76. Quinn Ellis | PG | Trento

6-4 | Age: 21.2 | Previously ranked: 88

Strengths: Ellis is a big guard who moved to Italy at the age of 16 and emerged as a valuable contributor in the EuroCup last season.

Weaknesses: With average explosiveness, a rudimentary handle and a streaky jumper, he showed his youth at times in the Italian first division.

The verdict: Ellis matured as a decision-maker, fit in well defensively and knocked down several big crunch-time shots as a bright spot for Trento last season. Even if he is not blessed with elite upside, he has several interesting attributes he can tap into long term with his size, feel for the game and competitiveness that all but guarantees he will be a longtime Euroleague and British national team player at the very worst.

---

6-8 ¼ | Age: 23.5 | Previously ranked: 72

Strengths: Tomlin is a rangy big man with intriguing physical tools and two-way versatility who continues to evolve on both ends after playing his first organized basketball in 2018.

Weaknesses: His narrow 205-pound frame makes it difficult for him to hold his ground around the basket and his feel for the game and physicality are still improving.

The verdict: Tomlin’s ability to finish lobs, make set shots and energetically move his feet on the perimeter on defense give him interesting ingredients, even if he lacks ideal polish and might never be the most physical big man.

---

6-0 ¾ | Age: 23.5 | Previously ranked: 84

Strengths: Ellis is a scoring combo guard whose ability to catch fire from beyond the arc stood out at times throughout his five collegiate seasons.

Weaknesses: Lacking great size, Ellis was a reluctant passer at times at USC who did not contribute enough defensively and lacked the scoring efficiency to will his team to more wins.

The verdict: Ellis has appealing talent as a shot-maker and overall scorer, but he doesn’t do enough other things at his size on nights when his shot isn’t falling to demand greater NBA interest. While his shooting will keep him in the conversation, his ability to improve defensively and as a playmaker will determine his ability to carve out a long-term niche.

---

6-3 ½ | Age: 22.5 | Previously ranked: 89

Strengths: Jones is a prolific scoring wing whose aggressiveness and improved shot-making prowess helped him make the most of coach Penny Hardaway’s green light in his lone season at Memphis.

Weaknesses: Jones is stronger than he is explosive and will need to show he can contribute by playing a more compact, efficient role than what he was asked to play at Memphis, especially as a facilitator. There are question marks about just how good of a shooter he is due to his streakiness in previous settings.

The verdict: The Dominican Republic native had a wildly productive season hunting shots and attacking relentlessly off the dribble, bringing a motor on both ends of the floor. Whether his knack for putting the ball in the basket holds up against longer, more physical defenders, and his ability to round out his game alongside more talented teammates are also points of interest.

---

6-6 | Age: 24.0 | Previously ranked: 86

Strengths: Miller is a strong-framed, tough-minded forward who made subtle improvements as a shooter to complement his terrific defensive intensity.

Weaknesses: Seeing quite a few minutes on the interior, Miller will need to diversify his game on both ends of the floor from the perimeter to increase his NBA appeal, but he is already 24 years old. While he started to shoot the ball more willingly as a fifth-year senior, his career 32% mark from 3-point range will need to improve to have a chance to carve out a role.

The verdict: Miller is a hard-working forward with the toughness and versatility to fit in defensively at the NBA level but has questions to answer about his role offensively and isn’t blessed with elite physical tools.

---

6-3 ¼ | Age: 20.9 | Previously ranked: 78

Strengths: Mintz is a relentless slashing combo guard who was the ACC’s second-leading scorer as a sophomore, getting to the free throw line at a tremendous rate.

Weaknesses: His ball dominant, inefficient offensive style was not particularly aesthetically pleasing, as he struggles to make 3-pointers effectively, relies heavily on tough midrange pull-ups and turns the ball over excessively, lacking length on the perimeter with a middling 6-foot-3 wingspan.

The verdict: Mintz had some impressive moments as a scorer using his aggressiveness, touch and footwork to draw fouls and finish through contact, but he doesn’t have great physical tools, has a ways to go with his decision-making and isn’t a good enough shooter to compensate.

---

6-3 ½ | Age: 23.3 | Previously ranked: 90

Strengths: Pullin is a strong guard with excellent size and a polished midrange game. His mistake-free style helped him seamlessly transition from the Big West to winning first-team All-SEC honors.

Weaknesses: He is not especially prolific from beyond the arc (106 made 3s in 137 games) or explosive enough to put pressure on the rim consistently, and he is not blessed with an elite playmaking feel making advanced reads off a live dribble or great defensive prowess.

The verdict: Pullin’s floor game translated impressively in Florida’s high-octane offense last season. While he might not be the most creative player, he is adept at getting to his spots and making basic passes while keeping turnovers to a minimum. His ability to continue to develop his pace, patience and perimeter shooting will be keys to showing he can be a viable backup point guard.

---

6-6 | Age: 24.0 | Previously ranked: 91

Strengths: Domask is a tough, versatile guard who played every position on the floor for Illinois, guarded the other teams’ best player most nights and created shots steadily in one-on-one situations en route to first-team All-Big Ten honors and an Elite Eight appearance.

Weaknesses: While he made a consistent impact, he shot just 30% on 3-pointers on the season and isn’t blessed with elite physical tools, with a 6-foot-6 wingspan and average athletic ability.

The verdict: Domask was one of the most valuable up-transfers in college basketball last season, as he steadily found ways to impact games, even recording a triple-double. His competitiveness, feel for the game and two-way versatility give him a chance to carve out playing time, especially if he finds his range as a pro.

---

6-8 | Age: 23.9 | Previously ranked: 92

Strengths: Williams is a strong-framed, long-armed power forward who thrived off the ball from the inside and outside and brought energy defensively as a fifth-year senior.

Weaknesses: His lack of great size and limitations as a ball handler, rebounder and passer put a ceiling on his role-player potential, as he does not have the highest skill level or feel for the game, mostly living off his energy.

The verdict: Williams has some outlines of a 3-and-D forward who can make occasional spot-up jumpers and bring intensity and toughness, making him a player NBA teams will want to take a closer look at in the G League. Williams’ ability to continue to make strides with his shooting — despite unorthodox mechanics — will likely ultimately determine his chances of seeing an NBA floor.

---

6-9 | Age: 23.7 | Previously ranked: 83

Strengths: Mitchell is a skilled big man who thrived in Kentucky’s 5-out offense early in the season, showing impressive skill and versatility at the power forward position.

Weaknesses: A late back injury derailed his season as he was unable to find the rhythm on his jumper that had opened things up for him early on, especially when Kentucky’s three 7-footers returned to the lineup and moved him from the center position to power forward. Conditioning and defensive intensity have long been concerns, which were amplified when he couldn’t make an outside shot in SEC play, causing his NBA interest to evaporate

The verdict: At his best, Mitchell is an all-around offensive weapon who can finish with touch, pass on the move and keep opposing big men honest from the perimeter. He doesn’t have great length or explosiveness for NBA purposes, so the consistency with which he can make an impact with his skill and feel will be key to the early part of his pro career.

---

5-11 | Age: 23.6 | Previously ranked: 93

Strengths: Stevens is a smart, seasoned point guard with a knack for changing speeds, making plays for others and knocking down pull-up jumpers.

Weaknesses: His lack of size is a limiting factor defensively and around the rim, and he’s not blessed with top-tier explosiveness or a great frame to compensate.

The verdict: A five-year starter who lifted Colorado State back to the NCAA tournament last season, Stevens is a rock-solid playmaker with an excellent feel for the game who has some clear-cut ingredients NBA teams are looking for in a third point guard, even if his lack of physical tools might be difficult for some to look past.

---

6-7 | Age: 23.1 | Previously ranked: 95

Strengths: Battle is a shot-making lefty forward with great consistency from beyond the arc and good all-around instincts on offense.

Weaknesses: His average length and physical tools will hamper his ability to contribute on the defensive end and be a factor on the glass.

The verdict: Battle shot the lights out in the Big Ten last season and fits a mold offensively with his ability to keep defenders honest off the ball. How he fits in defensively at the NBA level and whether he can contribute in other areas on nights his jumper isn’t falling are major question marks.

---

6-7 ¾ | Age: 24.9 | Previously ranked: 96

Strengths: LeDee is a strong, physical big man who broke out as one of the most productive players in the country as a sixth-year senior, averaging 21.4 points per game.

Weaknesses: Undersized for a center, without much length or a diverse skill set to match, he bullied overmatched college opponents on the interior at 24 years old, but he will likely need to diversify his scoring arsenal and incorporate a more consistent jump shot to better his chances of earning NBA playing time.

The verdict: LeDee was San Diego State’s star last season as he scored at will one-on-one, lived at the line and made subtle strides with his jumper. He’ll have opportunities to show his productivity can translate against similar-aged players in the G League and might very well endear himself to a team with his competitiveness, physicality and intensity.

---

6-6 ¾ | Age: 20.7 | Previously ranked: 98

Strengths: Sane is a physically gifted Senegalese power forward whose strength, length and top-tier explosiveness give him upside even if his season with the G League Ignite suggests he is still early in his development.

Weaknesses: With just an average skill level, feel for the game and decision-making, Sane had some productive games last season but struggled with consistency on both ends of the floor.

The verdict: Despite possessing a 7-foot-2 wingspan, shredded frame and highlight-reel-caliber leaping ability, Sane is still in the beginning stages of carving out an identity as a pro. Even so, his growth from last season in the G League and his time with the NBA Academy Africa is encouraging, making him a prospect teams will want to monitor over the next few years to see how he evolves.

---

6-6 | Age: 23.5 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: Ducas is a hard-nosed Australian wing who filled a translatable role at Saint Mary’s, where his toughness, 3-point shooting consistency and unselfish mentality made him a valuable player.

Weaknesses: He is not a particularly imposing athlete, raising questions about his upside as a finisher, shot creator and defender at the NBA level.

The verdict: Among the most accurate spot-up shooters in college basketball and with a 2-1 assist-to-turnover ratio, Ducas fits a clear mold. His maturity and smarts should allow him to play a role at the highest levels of professional basketball on top of what he brings as a floor spacer. If he can prove he can hold his own defensively, he has a chance to earn NBA minutes.

---

7-0 | Age: 25.0 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: Carlson is a 7-foot-1 stretch big man who has some real skill and versatility offensively with his quickness getting off his feet, an ability to handle and pass, and impressive shot-making prowess.

Weaknesses: At 219 pounds, despite already being 25 years old, his lack of strength is a limiting factor around the basket on both ends. He has never been much of a rebounder and was regularly attacked by average players at the college level, raising questions about his ability to hold his own defensively against pros.

The verdict: Carlson’s skill level is intriguing at his size, as the NBA is always looking for big men who can handle, pass and shoot, but his lack of strength and toughness hurts his viability on the other end of the floor considering he was one of the oldest players in college basketball this season.

---

6-6 | Age: 23.7 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: James is a powerfully built combo forward who showed flashes of two-way versatility, albeit inconsistently, in his five seasons at Tennessee. When it all came together, he was a defensive force who could pass and occasionally showed enough shot-making prowess to leave room for optimism.

Weaknesses: He is not a particularly dynamic athlete or shot-creator, he made just 33% of his career 3-pointers in college, and he left a lot to be desired from an aggressiveness standpoint, not improving as one might have expected after starting his career as a McDonald’s All American.

The verdict: James looks the part as a pro player, and his ability to use his frame to slide between the forward spots defensively is appealing. On the offensive end, he’ll occasionally put it all together in impressive fashion — sometimes even in important games — but then disappear for weeks at a time. He doesn’t have a strong skill he can hang his hat on yet. It’s possible a change of scenery will do him some good, as he does play like an NBA player when he is being aggressive.

---

6-0 | Age: 23.4 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: Gaines is an electric athlete who has rare speed and explosiveness. He shows flashes of impressive talent on both ends of the floor when he’s playing within himself.

Weaknesses: Gaines is small (a hair over 6-foot in shoes) and rail-thin — weighing 148 pounds at the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament. He struggled to put things together as a decision-maker (career 21% turnovers), shooter (28% on 3-pointers) or finisher (43% on 2-pointers), making it difficult to see how his game translates to the NBA level.

The verdict: Among the best athletes in college basketball, Gaines has some gifts that cannot be taught, and he was key to UAB’s NCAA tournament berth by contributing on both ends. With his poor size and frame, he’ll need to take a serious leap as a shot-maker and figure out how to play a more efficient brand of offense to give him a path to minutes at the NBA level, where he’d be a sleeper candidate to win the NBA slam dunk contest.

---

6-8 | Age: 24.7 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: Leons is a narrow-framed Dutch junior college product whose length, versatility and intensity on the defensive end are intriguing, especially when he is helping space the floor.

Weaknesses: At 201 pounds, but turning 25 in September, Leons will need to get stronger to maximize his defensive potential and is not a great athlete to boot. His ability to improve his consistency from beyond the arc will be equally important, after hitting 36% of his 3-pointers in his career at Bradley.

The verdict: An unselfish, multiple-effort player who covers ground guarding all over the floor with a sense of urgency and strong playmaking instincts, Leons doesn’t have the highest skill level but nonetheless thrived in a compact role at Bradley. His ability to improve the speed of his release and consistency from the NBA 3-point line will be key for a similar role at the NBA level.

---

6-3 | Age: 25.5 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: Couisnard has good size for a guard, a strong frame, very long arms and some real shot-creation and shot-making prowess, which he showed off in a scintillating two-game NCAA tournament stint by dropping 72 combined points against South Carolina and Creighton.

Weaknesses: Cousinard, already 25 years old, has never been an efficient scorer, struggling to finish effectively in traffic. He is more of a volume shooter than a real marksman and has provided inconsistent intensity on the defensive end.

The verdict: Couisnard is a relentless offensive player who made some strides as a rebounder and passer over his six collegiate seasons. He’s a good, but not great, athlete who could nonetheless find a role if he proves he can hone his productivity by playing a more efficient style.

---

96. Yannick Kraag | PF | Joventut

6-7 ½ | Age: 21.6 | Previously ranked: 80

Strengths: Kraag is a fluid Dutch swingman with terrific measurables (7-foot-1 wingspan) who turned the corner as a viable 3-and-D rotation player in Liga ACB last season.

Weaknesses: While he can catch a lob and make open shots, he remains limited with the ball and lacks ideal physicality and awareness on both ends of the floor.

The verdict: Kraag has been on the NBA radar for many years, and while he remains inconsistent and mostly a tease on both ends of the floor, his physical tools, budding shooting ability and theoretical defensive versatility give him the outline of a prospect NBA teams will want to monitor down the road.

---

6-8 | Age: 24.1 | Previously ranked: 26

Strengths: Nkamhoua is a chiseled big man whose feel as a passer and ability to switch defensively made him a valuable two-way asset at the collegiate level.

Weaknesses: Somewhat stuck between big-man positions, he has average size at 6-foot-9½, doesn’t rebound particularly well and lacks consistency as a shooter, hitting 35% of his career 3-pointers on limited attempts.

The verdict: Nkamhoua saw his fifth-year cut short by a wrist injury, but he is a known player whose potential as a connective forward is clearer than that of most seniors. His ability to stretch the floor is his obvious swing skill.

---

6-8 | Age: 22.9 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: Enaruna is a well-traveled Dutch big man with a 7-foot-1 wingspan and some two-way versatility who helped his standing in the pre-draft process with strong showings at the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament and in private workouts.

Weaknesses: He is somewhat stuck between big-man positions, lacking a degree of physicality and rebounding. He has never quite put things together as a 3-point shooter, hitting 27% of his career attempts in college.

The verdict: Enaruna was a significant mismatch at the Horizon League level with his quickness and skill level, being capable of putting the ball on the floor, pushing off the defensive glass, drawing fouls prolifically and improving his passing and toughness throughout his college career. He shows the ability to slide his feet while guarding all over the floor, having multi-positional versatility while switching defensively on the perimeter.

---

6-3 | Age: 23.3 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: Battle is an assertive, microwave-scoring guard who made tough jumpers in bunches just as often in the Big 12 for West Virginia as he did in the Big Sky at Montana State.

Weaknesses: His extreme limitations as a passer, as well as his inefficient and inconsistent offensive prowess, leaves question marks for his ability to play a more winning style of basketball alongside more talented teammates.

The verdict: Battle missed the early part of the season after the NCAA denied his waiver, but he proceeded to score 83 points over his first three games at West Virginia and then got just as hot at the Portsmouth Invitational Tournament. Shot-makers in his mold have a place in today’s NBA, but he has some things to prove beyond his ability to put the ball in the basket.

---

6-8 | Age: 24.0 | Previously ranked: NR

Strengths: Pember is a skilled big man who can space the floor, create shots off the dribble and can pass unselfishly, which made him a force to be reckoned with in the Big South, where he made a huge number of 3s and free throws with excellent percentages.

Weaknesses: At 209 pounds, he lacks the strength or grit to hold his ground inside and was a very poor rebounder throughout his college career. While he was productive at the low major level defensively, he has a lot to prove on that end of the floor against similarly sized big men and isn’t very versatile on the perimeter.

The verdict: An adaptable stat-sheet stuffer who recorded two triple-doubles this season, Pember had a terrific college career. His skill level operating inside and out made him invaluable at UNC Asheville, but his limited physical profile complicates his fit in the NBA.

---

Jonathan Givony is an NBA draft expert and the founder and co-owner of DraftExpress.com, a private scouting and analytics service used by NBA, NCAA and international teams.

Jeremy Woo is an NBA analyst specializing in prospect evaluation and the draft. He was previously a staff writer and draft insider at Sports Illustrated.